The NAACP applauded the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Watson v. Republican National Committee to protect mail-in voting access, affirming the rights of millions of Americans who rely on absentee and mail ballots to participate in our democracy and make their voices heard.  
 

The ruling represents a critical victory for voters across the country, particularly Black voters, seniors, rural communities, military personnel stationed overseas, and individuals with disabilities who disproportionately depend on mail-in voting to make their voices heard. 
 

“Good news rarely comes out of this Supreme Court, but today’s ruling is a win for our democracy,” said Derrick Johnson, President & CEO of the NAACP. “Your vote still matters, otherwise, those in power, like Donald Trump, wouldn’t be trying so hard to silence you at every turn. These rare victories should energize everyone to show up at the polls this November and vote, because if we do, we can and we will stop this tyrannical administration.” 
 

The case came amid growing national concern over attempts to limit or block access to mail-in voting. Efforts that NAACP and other civil rights groups warned would disproportionately disenfranchise marginalized communities. Voting by mail has long served as a critical tool to expand participation in elections, ensuring that individuals who cannot vote in person still have an opportunity to engage in the democratic process. 
 

While this is a victory for voters, the NAACP emphasized that the fight to protect voting rights is far from over. Across the country, state legislatures – particularly in the South – continue to introduce policies that limit access to the ballot, from restrictive identification requirements to redistricting efforts that dilute Black voting strength. 
 

Most recently, the NAACP sued President Trump to fight his Executive Order to limit mail-in ballots to an approved list of absentee voters. The Association will continue its commitment to defending every American’s right to vote — in person, by mail, or by any lawful means — and to ensuring that elections remain free, fair, and accessible to all. To learn more about NAACP’s fight to protect the right to vote, visit naacp.org/vote.  
 

WASHINGTON — The NAACP welcomes the United States Supreme Court’s decision affirming the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment. 
 

In upholding more than a century of legal precedent, the Court reaffirmed a foundational principle of American democracy: that all persons born on U.S. soil are citizens, regardless of their parentage. 
 

“Trump’s attempted assault on the 14th Amendment was dealt a major blow today. This decision is a powerful affirmation of the Constitution and the enduring promise of equality it represents,” said Derrick Johnson, President & CEO of the NAACP. “For over 150 years, the Fourteenth Amendment has guaranteed citizenship to everyone born in this country. Today, the Court rightly rejected efforts to undermine that core protection and instead upheld a principle that is essential to our democracy.” 
 

The NAACP emphasized that the principle of birthright citizenship was enshrined in the aftermath of the Civil War to ensure that formerly enslaved people and their descendants would be recognized as full citizens. The Court’s decision preserves that legacy and reinforces the Constitution’s commitment to equal protection under the law. 
 

While celebrating the decision, the NAACP will monitor ongoing efforts to challenge civil and human rights. The Association will remain vigilant and committed to defending the progress we have made and advancing justice for all. 
 

The NAACP reaffirmed its commitment to protecting civil rights and ensuring that the Constitution’s promises are fully realized for every community across the nation. 
 

Contact: NAACP, communications@naacpnet.org 
Public Citizen Litigation Group, obaddar@citizen.org  
LDF, media@naacpldf.org 
 

WASHINGTON — Today, a federal judge issued an order blocking procedures proposed by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to limit mail-in voting for certain voters. The order came in response to a successful motion filed by Public Citizen Litigation Group and the Legal Defense Fund (LDF), on behalf of the NAACP, to enforce a 2021 settlement agreement in which USPS committed to prioritizing the timely delivery of election mail, including mail-in ballots, without exception.

On June 2, as directed by an Executive Order issued by President Trump on March 31, USPS published a proposed rule under which it would refuse to deliver mail-in ballots to voters if state or local election officials did not provide certain information to USPS and use a certain envelope design. In granting the NAACP’s motion, the court agreed that the proposed procedures would violate the settlement agreement and prohibited USPS from implementing the proposed procedures. 

“This ruling is a critical step in protecting the rights of voters who rely on the timely delivery of mail-in ballots to participate in our democracy,” said Anthony P. Ashton, Senior Associate General Counsel, NAACP. “The proposed USPS changes would have created unnecessary and unlawful barriers, in direct violation of the USPS’s mandate to prioritize election mail. Those barriers could have disproportionately harmed Black voters, who are more likely to rely on mail voting due to longstanding inequities in access. Put simply, the use of mail-in voting helps reduce voter intimidation at the polls and election day dirty tricks. This decision makes clear that access to the ballot cannot be tied to arbitrary requirements. The NAACP will continue to hold this government accountable when it attempts to undermine fair and equal access to the electoral process.”

“The court today correctly recognized that USPS’s plan to create roadblocks to mail-in voting was inconsistent with its commitment to timely deliver election mail,” said Allison Zieve, director of Public Citizen Litigation Group. “USPS’s plan was unwise, unlawful, and a threat to the millions of voters who rely on mailed ballots to participate in our democracy.”

“Today’s decision recognizes that USPS cannot disregard its legal obligation to timely deliver mail-in ballots to all voters,” said Sam Spital, Associate Director-Counsel of LDF. “We are glad that the court blocked a blatant attempt to renege on this commitment through a proposed rule that ran the risk of undermining the fairness of our national elections, creating particular dangers for Black voters. LDF will continue to defend our democracy and combat unlawful restrictions of the right to vote.” 

Read more about the NAACP v. USPS case here. A short Q&A about this case and others challenging the USPS election proposed is here.

# # #

About NAACP 
 

The NAACP advocates, agitates, and litigates for the civil rights due to Black America. Our legacy is built on the foundation of grassroots activism by the biggest civil rights pioneers of the 20th century and is sustained by 21st century activists. From classrooms and courtrooms to city halls and Congress, our network of members across the country works to secure the social and political power that will end race-based discrimination. That work is rooted in racial equity, civic engagement, and supportive policies and institutions for all marginalized people. We are committed to a world without racism where Black people enjoy equitable opportunities in thriving communities. 
 

June 9, 2026 

Contacts:  
communications@naacpnet.org  

The NAACP, NAACP Tennessee State Conference, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and LDF file motion for preliminary injunction before a three judge panel in federal court on behalf of impacted voters 
 

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — The NAACP and the NAACP Tennessee State Conference and impacted voters, along with co-counsels the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and LDF, have filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to block Tennessee’s newly enacted congressional map, which dismantles the state’s only majority-Black district and unlawfully dilutes Black voting power. The filing is available here. 
 

The motion asks the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee to halt implementation of the map before the 2026 elections, arguing that the plan was enacted with discriminatory intent in violation of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. 
 

“Let’s be clear: this map is not about fairness, it’s about fear,” said Derrick Johnson, President and CEO of the NAACP. “Tennessee lawmakers saw Black political power and made a calculated decision to dismantle it. They rigged the system and diluted our community’s voting power. We will not allow officials to cheat and silence our voices. We’ll fight this injustice in every courtroom necessary.” 
 

Last month, Tennessee lawmakers rushed through legislation that eliminated Congressional District 9, a Memphis-based district that has served as the state’s only majority-Black district for decades. Within days of the Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais, the legislature carried out a special session that led to the dismantling of Congressional District 9 by cracking the Black population across three districts.
  

“We’re fighting for our communities, our neighborhoods, and our voices,” said Gloria Sweet-Love, President of the Tennessee State Conference of the NAACP. “In Memphis and across Shelby County, we’ve built generations of advocacy, organizing, and civic power. This intentionally discriminatory map seeks to break that apart by dividing us and weakening our voice at the ballot box. We’re calling on the courts to stop this map before elections, before it can harm our communities.”  
 

The filing details how lawmakers ignored clear warnings that the plan would harm Black voters, used questionable and inconsistent explanations for their actions, and departed sharply from traditional redistricting standards in a rushed and opaque process.  
 

“Make no mistake, what we are seeing in Tennessee and across the South is an undeniable effort to strip Black voters of their power and their voice,” said Kristen Clarke, General Counsel of the NAACP. “The evidence here shows a calculated and intentional effort to dismantle a longstanding majority-Black district through a rushed, opaque process. A preliminary injunction ahead of elections is necessary to ensure that elections proceed under a lawful and constitutional map.” 
 

“Tennessee’s congressional map continues a troubling pattern of stifling Black political power and fracturing communities that have long organized to make their voices heard,” said Shaylyn Cochran, deputy executive director at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. “Our complaint underscores the serious and ongoing harm voters face under this map, and we will continue to fight until Black voters in Tennessee are both able and empowered to make their voices heard. This is not a ‘nice to have.’ It is the cornerstone of our democracy.” 
 

The motion demonstrates that Black voting power in Memphis and Shelby County has been fractured, making it more difficult to elect candidates of their choice. It further shows that race played a central role in the map’s configuration, despite lawmakers’ claims to the contrary. 
 

“Targeting Black voters by intentionally severing their communities into three districts to entrench white political power is both shameful and illegal,” said Kathryn Sadasivan, Counsel at the Legal Defense Fund. “Black voters deserve fair representation in government, and they have suffered decades of intentional and blatant discrimination at the hands of those who oppose a free and fair multiracial democracy. Tennessee legislators turned their backs on Black voters and abandoned their core responsibility to protect their constituents when enacting this map. The court must not follow in their footsteps.” 
 

The NAACP’s motion underscores that without immediate court intervention, Black voters will suffer irreparable harm, including the loss of fair representation in upcoming elections — harm that cannot be undone after ballots are cast. The motion is filed on behalf of civil rights and social justice organizations including the National Urban League.  
 

“Memphis has paid too high a price for the right to vote to have its power carved up behind closed doors,” said Marc H. Morial, President and CEO, National Urban League. “The Memphis Urban League’s complaint speaks directly to the question of whether our democracy will honor equal protection and the Voting Rights Act, or tolerate modern-day vote dilution. We stand with the Memphis Urban League and the people of Memphis in demanding maps that reflect communities, not discrimination.” 
 

This latest action in Tennessee is part of NAACP’s broader effort to challenge discriminatory redistricting practices nationwide and to defend the fundamental right to vote. For more information, visit www.naacp.org. The filing is available here. 
 

# # #  

MEDIA CONTACTS: 
NAACP: communications@naacpnet.org | Advancement Project: mediadesk@advancementproject.org 

WASHINGTON –  Today, in a significant victory for Virginia college students, a federal district court judge approved a consent decree requiring Virginia officials to accept certain voter registration applications completed by college students. Previously, students’ voter registration applications were being rejected due to immaterial mistakes or omissions. The consent decree can be found here. 

The consent decree, adopted by the Virginia State Board of Elections to resolve a lawsuit brought by the NAACP, prohibits officials from rejecting registration applications submitted by eligible students that omit unnecessary details like a dorm room number or campus mailbox number.  Officials across Virginia have been rejecting large numbers of student applications for this reason in recent years, including during the leadup to the November 2025 statewide election. 

“This consent decree is a major win for Virginia voters,” said John Powers, Legal Director at Advancement Project.  “For too long, too many Virginia college students have been disenfranchised due to unnecessary and burdensome restrictions.  This agreement removes those barriers and mandates important reforms that will allow more students to register successfully and cast ballots that count.” 

The consent decree mandates the following: 

(1) Virginia students who live on campus will not have their registration applications rejected for providing an address that does not include a dorm name, dorm room number, campus mailing address, or campus mailbox number, when that information is not needed to place students in a precinct.  

(2) Virginia officials must provide guidance and training to local registrars on this requirement and on how to handle student voter registration applications.   

(3) Officials must amend Virginia’s voter registration application to make clear what address information is needed for people living in student dormitories and other group housing.  

(4) Virginia officials must engage in rulemaking efforts to codify the new registration requirements in the Virginia Administrative Code. 

The consent decree is part of a settlement agreement resolving a lawsuit initially brought by the NAACP Virginia State Conference last year against Virginia election officials.  NAACP Virginia and Advancement Project filed the case shortly before the November 2025 general election. Their investigation found that college students across Virginia, including those at HBCUs such as Norfolk State University and Virginia State University, were being kept off the voter rolls because their registration applications did not include certain campus address-related details — even though providing that information is not required under Virginia law. 

“This agreement makes clear that eligible voters cannot be denied access to the ballot based on technicalities that have nothing to do with their eligibility,” said Anthony P. Ashton, Senior Associate General Counsel at NAACP. “College students in Virginia — particularly those at historically Black colleges and universities — have faced unnecessary and unlawful barriers to voter registration. This consent decree sends a strong message that those practices will not stand. The NAACP will continue to fight to ensure that every eligible voter, regardless of age or address, has a fair and equal opportunity to participate in our democracy.” 

The NAACP Virginia State Conference has long worked to eliminate barriers to the ballot box and ensure equitable access to voting for all Virginians. Its victory in this case vindicates the organization’s commitment to protecting the rights of young voters and preventing systemic disenfranchisement.  

For interviews, contact mediadesk@advancementproject.org or communications@naacpnet.org.  

une 3, 2026
Contact: Communications@naacpnet.org

WASHINGTON — The NAACP is condemning the U.S. Supreme Court’s latest decision allowing Alabama to use a congressional map previously found to be intentionally discriminatory against Black voters, warning that the ruling marks another dangerous step in the dismantling of voting rights in the state and across the country. 

The Court’s action follows its most recent decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which has triggered racial gerrymandering efforts across the South. 

“This Court is actively working to strip Black voters of power and voice at a speed that has pulled us right back into the Jim Crow era. Our message to communities remains the same — the best way to express dissent is by showing up at the ballot box this election season,” said Kristen Clarke, General Counsel of the NAACP. “The Supreme Court continues to unleash chaos in our democratic process, and with this latest action, gives Alabama approval to use a congressional map that had previously been found to be infected with racially discriminatory intent.”

The NAACP emphasized that fair and representative districting is essential to ensuring that Black communities have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice and participate fully in the political process. Decisions like this one not only weaken representation in Congress but also threaten access to critical resources and policy outcomes that impact communities nationwide.

As states – particularly southern states – continue to pursue redistricting efforts that diminish Black voting strength, the NAACP reaffirmed its commitment to pursuing all legal, legislative, and grassroots strategies available to protect voting rights and hold decision-makers accountable.

The NAACP urges voters to remain engaged and mobilized this election season, emphasizing that civic participation and voting remain the most powerful tools in the fight to safeguard democracy. As such, the Association is currently leading mobilization campaigns across the country this midterm season to continue driving voters to the polls to elect leaders who will advocate on their behalf. 

For more information, visit naacp.org. 

We’re calling for Black athletes, families, alumni, and fans to withhold athletic and financial support from public universities in southern states attacking Black voting rights.

No Representation. No Recruitment.
No Revenue.

Across the South, Black athletes have helped build some of the most profitable college athletic programs in America, generating hundreds of millions of dollars in annual revenue. At the same time, several southern state governments are moving to limit, reduce, weaken, or erase Black voting representation by creating new, unconstitutional voting districts. 

You can’t have one without the other. Profiting off of Black athletes while suppressing their vote is out of bounds.

Contact: Chyna Fields, cfields@naacpnet.org

WASHINGTON — The NAACP today launched the “Out of Bounds” campaign, a national call for Black athletes, families, fans, alumni, and consumers to withhold athletic and financial support from public universities in states that have moved to limit, weaken, or erase Black voting representation in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which gutted what was left of the Voting Rights Act. The NAACP identified eight priority states — Tennessee, Louisiana, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, and Georgia — and targeted flagship public athletic programs generating more than $100 million in annual revenue that continue to recruit Black athletes while their state governments dismantle the political power of Black communities.

“What these states have done is not a policy disagreement. It is a sprint to erase Black political power,” said Derrick Johnson, President & CEO, NAACP. “These actions happened in days, in some cases in hours, of a Supreme Court ruling that gives extremist lawmakers a playbook to erode Black representation. The NAACP will not watch the same institutions that depend on Black athletic prowess to fill their stadiums and their bank accounts remain silent while their states strip Black communities of their voice. Out of Bounds is our answer: we are naming the contradiction, and we are calling on Black athletes, families, fans, and consumers to act on it. The same power that built these programs can be redirected. And it will be.”

The economic stakes of the campaign are significant. The flagship universities in the eight targeted states collectively generate billions of dollars in annual athletic revenue.

The “Out of Bounds” campaign focuses on one primary ask, calling on top football and basketball recruits currently being actively recruited by targeted programs to withhold their commitments until the states in question restore fair congressional maps and meaningful Black representation. The campaign also calls on current college athletes — including those who may already be enrolled at targeted programs — to consider their options, including the transfer portal, and to use their platforms and NIL reach to elevate fair maps and voting rights.

“This generation of Black athletes understands something that those who came before them were never afforded the chance to say so plainly: your talent is yours, and so is your community’s political power,” said Tylik McMillan, National Director, Youth and College Division, NAACP. “These are not separate issues. The state that is working to erase your grandmother’s congressional district is the same state whose governor will stand on the field and celebrate your touchdown or game-winning shot. We are asking young people — recruits, current athletes, fans — to see that connection clearly and to act on it. The Out of Bounds campaign is about redirecting what has always been ours, power and perseverance.”

The campaign issues calls to action across three audiences. 

• Black athletes and recruits are asked to withhold commitments from targeted programs, to ask coaches and athletic directors where their universities stand on voting rights, and to visit and seriously consider HBCUs.
• Current college athletes are asked to use their platforms to elevate the issue, to ask institutional leadership for public statements opposing racial vote dilution, and to consider all available options under the transfer portal.
• Fans, alumni, donors, and consumers are asked to stop purchasing tickets, merchandise, and licensed apparel from targeted programs and to redirect that spending to HBCUs — their athletics programs, scholarship funds, NIL collectives, bands, and alumni foundations.

The Out of Bounds campaign will remain in effect until targeted states adopt state-level voting rights protections, repeal maps that dilute Black voting power, restore congressional and judicial districts that reflect the Black population’s actual strength, and commit to transparent and community-centered redistricting processes. Our sentiment is clear: No Representation. No Recruitment. No Revenue.

May 14, 2026

Contact: Chyna Fields, cfields@naacpnet.org 

WASHINGTON– In the first hearing of NAACP v. Trump today, the NAACP, Common Cause, Black Voters Matter, and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law urged the court to immediately stop President Trump’s latest executive order on mail-in ballots, which would give the federal government control over how Americans vote. The executive order was released in March 2026, and the NAACP opposed it.  

Today, plaintiffs argued the executive order illegally overrides state and congressional authority to set election law. By conditioning mail-in voting to the use of an unreliable, notoriously error-ridden federal database, the order also threatens to prevent millions of eligible voters from casting ballots. Additionally, the administration’s threats of prosecution would also irreparably harm both individual voters and interfere with the success of civic engagement efforts made by organizations like the NAACP.   

“Whether by mailbox or ballot box, every American deserves the right to cast their vote,” said Derrick Johnson, NAACP President and CEO. “Mail-in ballots have long helped provide access to the democratic process for Black voters, Americans in rural communities, the military and overseas citizens, the elderly, people who can’t take off work to vote, and more. We should be focusing on ensuring that every American’s voice is heard, not limiting access to the ballot box.” 

Trump’s order creates a sweeping and confusing new system designed to give the federal executive branch veto power over who can vote. Specifically, the order: 

• Directs DHS to compile a list of purportedly eligible voters in each state, drawn from the SAVE immigration database and Social Security records — databases that are incomplete, outdated, and not designed to verify citizenship or state residence.   
• Orders the U.S. Postal Service, an independent agency, to refuse delivery of mail-in and absentee ballots for any voter not enrolled on a federally created “Mail-In and Absentee Participation List” — without any requirement to notify the voter or the state that their ballot was blocked.  
• Threatens criminal prosecution of state and local election officials, individuals, and organizations like the NAACP, Common Cause, and Black Voters Matter, that help voters cast mail-in ballots if the federal government views those voters as ineligible — an attempt to chill voter assistance work.  
• Threatens to withhold federal funding from any state that does not comply with the order’s demands. 

Last week, the NAACP filed a preliminary injunction motion to block the executive order from taking effect while the lawsuit proceeds. This move aims to prevent further interference and ensure the integrity of our nation’s elections remains in place. We will continue our fight for fair practices in America’s democratic process so every eligible voter may effectively exercise their right to vote.

To view the lawsuit, click here.

To view the preliminary injunction, click here.